Amae Health vs K Health
Amae Health vs K Health, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Amae Health is on 45/100 and K Health on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Amae Health
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 26/100
K Health
- our overall score: 63/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 380 against 107
- funding raised: $372M against $27.3M
- LinkedIn following: 50,830 against 10,923
At a glance
| Measure | Amae Health | K Health |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for personalized chronic care management and patient engagement. | K Health is an AI-driven primary care company providing 24/7 virtual healthcare solutions to millions in the U.S. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Chronic Care Management, Patient Engagement | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Primary Care, Virtual Care |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Amae Health | K Health |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 107 | 380 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +5.1% |
| Open roles | 29 | Not published |
| Total funding | $27.3M | $372M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series G |
| Valuation | Not published | $900M |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,923 | 50,830 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Amae Health | K Health |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Amae Health | K Health |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Reddit Pixel | Not detected |
Amae Health vs K Health: common questions
Which is better, Amae Health or K Health?
On our 0-100 score K Health rates higher (63/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Amae Health and K Health compare on the numbers?
Amae Health leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 26/100). K Health leads on our overall score (63/100 against 45/100), domain rating (64/100 against 34/100), headcount (380 against 107), funding raised ($372M against $27.3M), LinkedIn following (50,830 against 10,923).
Read the full Amae Health review and pricing or the K Health review and pricing. You can also browse other Amae Health alternatives we track.