Altasciences vs Hexagon
Altasciences vs Hexagon, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Altasciences is on 70/100 and Hexagon on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Altasciences
- our overall score: 70/100 against 62/100
- domain rating: 50/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 1,896 against 67
- funding raised: $79.0M against $61.0M
Hexagon
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Altasciences | Hexagon |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Integrated drug development solutions for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, from preclinical to clinical trials. | Biotech company using genomics and AI to discover novel small-molecule medicines from microbial genomes. |
| Category | Biotech & Longevity, Drug Discovery, Clinical Trials, Contract Research Organization | AI, Biotech, Drug Discovery |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 1992 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Laval, Canada | Menlo Park, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Altasciences | Hexagon |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,896 | 67 |
| Open roles | 96 | Not published |
| Total funding | $79.0M | $61.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 42,982 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Altasciences | Hexagon |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 57/100 |
| Team | 72/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 5/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Altasciences | Hexagon |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
Altasciences vs Hexagon: common questions
Which is better, Altasciences or Hexagon?
On our 0-100 score Altasciences rates higher (70/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Altasciences and Hexagon compare on the numbers?
Altasciences leads on our overall score (70/100 against 62/100), domain rating (50/100 against 28/100), headcount (1,896 against 67), funding raised ($79.0M against $61.0M).
Read the full Altasciences review and pricing or the Hexagon review and pricing. You can also browse other Altasciences alternatives we track.