Altasciences vs Celerion
Altasciences vs Celerion, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Altasciences is on 70/100 and Celerion on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Altasciences
- our overall score: 70/100 against 59/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 1,896 against 1,162
- funding raised: $79.0M against $45.0M
- LinkedIn following: 42,982 against 26,451
Celerion
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Altasciences | Celerion |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Integrated drug development solutions for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, from preclinical to clinical trials. | A global leader in clinical pharmacology and bioanalytical sciences. |
| Category | Biotech & Longevity, Drug Discovery, Clinical Trials, Contract Research Organization | Biotechnology, Pharmaceuticals, Healthcare, Life Sciences |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1992 | 1975 |
| Headquarters | Laval, Canada | Lincoln, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Altasciences | Celerion |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,896 | 1,162 |
| Open roles | 77 | Not published |
| Total funding | $79.0M | $45.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Majority Investment |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 42,982 | 26,451 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Altasciences | Celerion |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 58/100 |
| Team | 72/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Altasciences | Celerion |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
Altasciences vs Celerion: common questions
Which is better, Altasciences or Celerion?
On our 0-100 score Altasciences rates higher (70/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Altasciences and Celerion compare on the numbers?
Altasciences leads on our overall score (70/100 against 59/100), domain rating (49/100 against 41/100), headcount (1,896 against 1,162), funding raised ($79.0M against $45.0M), LinkedIn following (42,982 against 26,451).
Read the full Altasciences review and pricing or the Celerion review and pricing. You can also browse other Altasciences alternatives we track.