AlmaScience vs UBQ Materials
AlmaScience vs UBQ Materials, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AlmaScience is on 14/100 and UBQ Materials on 51/100.
Where each one leads
AlmaScience
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
UBQ Materials
- our overall score: 51/100 against 14/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 4/100
At a glance
| Measure | AlmaScience | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AlmaScience is developing sustainable electronics to reduce the carbon footprint of technology. | UBQ Materials converts unsorted household waste into a sustainable, bio-based thermoplastic material, replacing conventional plastics and other finite resources. |
| Category | Sustainable Electronics, Climate Tech, Advanced Manufacturing & Materials, Biodegradable Electronics | Cleantech, Recycling, Packaging, Plastic |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Material |
| Founded | 2021 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Porto, Portugal | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AlmaScience | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 80 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +9.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $240M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 20,076 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AlmaScience | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 14/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 4/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AlmaScience | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | AlmaScience | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 5 positive, 1 negative across 6 threads |
“UBQ Materials can convert 100% of the waste stream to a plastic substitute. Does this mean the end for landfills?.”r/enviroaction
AlmaScience vs UBQ Materials: common questions
Which is better, AlmaScience or UBQ Materials?
On our 0-100 score UBQ Materials rates higher (51/100 against 14/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AlmaScience and UBQ Materials compare on the numbers?
UBQ Materials leads on our overall score (51/100 against 14/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 22/100), domain rating (53/100 against 4/100).
What do real users say about AlmaScience and UBQ Materials?
UBQ Materials: 5 positive and 1 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/enviroaction.
Read the full AlmaScience review and pricing or the UBQ Materials review and pricing. You can also browse other AlmaScience alternatives we track.