Allurion Technologies vs XCath
Allurion Technologies vs XCath, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Allurion Technologies is on 53/100 and XCath on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Allurion Technologies
- domain rating: 62/100 against 12/100
- headcount: 142 against 31
- funding raised: $172M against $54.0M
XCath
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | XCath |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A medical device company offering a comprehensive, swallowable gastric balloon program for weight loss. | Pioneering neuro-endovascular surgical robotics for precise, remote-controlled treatment of brain aneurysms and strokes. |
| Category | Medical Devices, Weight Management, Healthcare Technology, Biotechnology | Medical Devices, Robotics, Healthcare, Biotechnology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Natick, United States | Houston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | XCath |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 142 | 31 |
| Total funding | $172M | $54.0M |
| Latest round | Private Placement | Series C |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | XCath |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 12/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | XCath |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Fastly |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Allurion Technologies vs XCath: common questions
Which is better, Allurion Technologies or XCath?
On our 0-100 score XCath rates higher (54/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Allurion Technologies and XCath compare on the numbers?
Allurion Technologies leads on domain rating (62/100 against 12/100), headcount (142 against 31), funding raised ($172M against $54.0M).
Read the full Allurion Technologies review and pricing or the XCath review and pricing. You can also browse other Allurion Technologies alternatives we track.