Allurion Technologies vs Sub-Q Bionics
Allurion Technologies vs Sub-Q Bionics, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Allurion Technologies is on 53/100 and Sub-Q Bionics on 33/100.
Where each one leads
Allurion Technologies
- our overall score: 53/100 against 33/100
- funding raised: $172M against $1.5M
Sub-Q Bionics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Sub-Q Bionics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A medical device company offering a comprehensive, swallowable gastric balloon program for weight loss. | Developing next-generation solutions to improve care for patients living with lymphedema. |
| Category | Medical Devices, Weight Management, Healthcare Technology, Biotechnology | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Natick, United States | Stillwater, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Sub-Q Bionics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 142 | Not published |
| Total funding | $172M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Private Placement | Pre-Seed |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Sub-Q Bionics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 33/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 31/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Sub-Q Bionics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Allurion Technologies vs Sub-Q Bionics: common questions
Which is better, Allurion Technologies or Sub-Q Bionics?
On our 0-100 score Allurion Technologies rates higher (53/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Allurion Technologies and Sub-Q Bionics compare on the numbers?
Allurion Technologies leads on our overall score (53/100 against 33/100), funding raised ($172M against $1.5M).
Read the full Allurion Technologies review and pricing or the Sub-Q Bionics review and pricing. You can also browse other Allurion Technologies alternatives we track.