Allurion Technologies vs Sedivention
Allurion Technologies vs Sedivention, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Allurion Technologies is on 53/100 and Sedivention on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Allurion Technologies
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 11/100
- funding raised: $172M against $10.0M
Sedivention
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Sedivention |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A medical device company offering a comprehensive, swallowable gastric balloon program for weight loss. | Developing a minimally invasive, one-time outpatient therapy for obesity treatment. |
| Category | Medical Devices, Weight Management, Healthcare Technology, Biotechnology | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, HealthTech, Obesity Treatment |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Natick, United States | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Sedivention |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 142 | Not published |
| Total funding | $172M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Private Placement | Seed |
| Valuation | $500M | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Sedivention |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | 36/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 55/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 11/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Sedivention |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Allurion Technologies vs Sedivention: common questions
Which is better, Allurion Technologies or Sedivention?
On our 0-100 score Sedivention rates higher (54/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Allurion Technologies and Sedivention compare on the numbers?
Allurion Technologies leads on agent readiness (38/100 against 27/100), domain rating (62/100 against 11/100), funding raised ($172M against $10.0M).
Read the full Allurion Technologies review and pricing or the Sedivention review and pricing. You can also browse other Allurion Technologies alternatives we track.