Allurion Technologies vs Imperative Care
Allurion Technologies vs Imperative Care, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Allurion Technologies is on 53/100 and Imperative Care on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Allurion Technologies
- domain rating: 62/100 against 37/100
- funding raised: $172M against $100M
Imperative Care
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Imperative Care |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A medical device company offering a comprehensive, swallowable gastric balloon program for weight loss. | Revolutionizing the treatment of thromboembolic disease through innovative medical technology and connected care solutions. |
| Category | Medical Devices, Weight Management, Healthcare Technology, Biotechnology | Medical Devices, HealthTech, Biotechnology, Life Sciences |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Natick, United States | Campbell, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Imperative Care |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 142 | Not published |
| Total funding | $172M | $100M |
| Latest round | Private Placement | Series E |
| Valuation | $500M | $1.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Imperative Care |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 16/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 37/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Imperative Care |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Allurion Technologies vs Imperative Care: common questions
Which is better, Allurion Technologies or Imperative Care?
On our 0-100 score Imperative Care rates higher (54/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Allurion Technologies and Imperative Care compare on the numbers?
Allurion Technologies leads on domain rating (62/100 against 37/100), funding raised ($172M against $100M).
Read the full Allurion Technologies review and pricing or the Imperative Care review and pricing. You can also browse other Allurion Technologies alternatives we track.