Allurion Technologies vs Establishment Labs Holdings
Allurion Technologies vs Establishment Labs Holdings, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Allurion Technologies is on 53/100 and Establishment Labs Holdings on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Allurion Technologies
- our overall score: 53/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 51/100
- funding raised: $172M against $63.0M
Establishment Labs Holdings
- headcount: 954 against 142
At a glance
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Establishment Labs Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A medical device company offering a comprehensive, swallowable gastric balloon program for weight loss. | A global medical technology company focused on women's health and wellness, particularly in breast aesthetics and reconstruction. |
| Category | Medical Devices, Weight Management, Healthcare Technology, Biotechnology | Medical Devices, Biotechnology, Healthcare |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2009 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Natick, United States | Wellington, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Establishment Labs Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 142 | 954 |
| Open roles | Not published | 18 |
| Total funding | $172M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Private Placement | Debt Financing |
| Valuation | $500M | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 36,364 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Establishment Labs Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Allurion Technologies | Establishment Labs Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Allurion Technologies vs Establishment Labs Holdings: common questions
Which is better, Allurion Technologies or Establishment Labs Holdings?
On our 0-100 score Allurion Technologies rates higher (53/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Allurion Technologies and Establishment Labs Holdings compare on the numbers?
Allurion Technologies leads on our overall score (53/100 against 48/100), domain rating (62/100 against 51/100), funding raised ($172M against $63.0M). Establishment Labs Holdings leads on headcount (954 against 142).
Read the full Allurion Technologies review and pricing or the Establishment Labs Holdings review and pricing. You can also browse other Allurion Technologies alternatives we track.