All-Hands AI vs Cursor
All-Hands AI vs Cursor, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: All-Hands AI is on 49/100 and Cursor on 77/100.
Where each one leads
All-Hands AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 72/100
- funding raised: $2.9B against $5.0M
At a glance
| Measure | All-Hands AI | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source platform for building and running AI coding agents that automate software development tasks. | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, AI Coding Assistant, Developer Tools | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | All-Hands AI | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,081 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Open roles | 2 | Not published |
| Total funding | $5.0M | $2.9B |
| Latest round | Seed | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $50B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 361,335 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | All-Hands AI | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 33/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 83/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 93/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | All-Hands AI | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| CMS | Ghost | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | All-Hands AI | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI-Powered Software Development Agents, Local and Cloud Deployment Options, Flexible Interaction Modes, Community-Driven Development | Not published |
| Current offer | Not published | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra |
All-Hands AI vs Cursor: common questions
Which is better, All-Hands AI or Cursor?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do All-Hands AI and Cursor compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 32/100), domain rating (90/100 against 72/100), funding raised ($2.9B against $5.0M).
Read the full All-Hands AI review and pricing or the Cursor review and pricing. You can also browse other All-Hands AI alternatives we track.