All Eyes vs Pitch
All Eyes vs Pitch, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: All Eyes is on 9/100 and Pitch on 62/100.
Where each one leads
All Eyes
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Pitch
- our overall score: 62/100 against 9/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | All Eyes | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI transformation consultancy redesigning business systems for increased productivity and efficiency. | Collaborative pitch deck and presentation software for modern teams. |
| Category | AI Strategy, Business Consulting, Productivity Enhancement, Sales Enablement | Presentation Software, Collaboration Tools, Productivity Software, Sales Enablement |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | All Eyes | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 74 |
| Total funding | Not published | $73.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 37,679 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | All Eyes | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 9/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | All Eyes | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Ghost | Framer |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
All Eyes vs Pitch: common questions
Which is better, All Eyes or Pitch?
On our 0-100 score Pitch rates higher (62/100 against 9/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do All Eyes and Pitch compare on the numbers?
Pitch leads on our overall score (62/100 against 9/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 47/100).
Read the full All Eyes review and pricing or the Pitch review and pricing. You can also browse other All Eyes alternatives we track.