AliveCor vs ScreenPoint Medical
AliveCor vs ScreenPoint Medical, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AliveCor is on 64/100 and ScreenPoint Medical on 54/100.
Where each one leads
AliveCor
- our overall score: 64/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 209 against 79
- funding raised: $257M against $30.0M
- LinkedIn following: 25,427 against 8,096
ScreenPoint Medical
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | AliveCor | ScreenPoint Medical |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered ECG sensors and digital cardiac care solutions for continuous heart health monitoring. | AI-powered breast cancer detection and risk assessment solutions. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Digital Health | HealthTech, Artificial Intelligence, Medical Devices, Biotechnology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | Nijmegen, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AliveCor | ScreenPoint Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | 79 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $257M | $30.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Grant |
| Valuation | $467M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,427 | 8,096 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AliveCor | ScreenPoint Medical |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AliveCor | ScreenPoint Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
AliveCor vs ScreenPoint Medical: common questions
Which is better, AliveCor or ScreenPoint Medical?
On our 0-100 score AliveCor rates higher (64/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AliveCor and ScreenPoint Medical compare on the numbers?
AliveCor leads on our overall score (64/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (37/100 against 21/100), domain rating (67/100 against 41/100), headcount (209 against 79), funding raised ($257M against $30.0M), LinkedIn following (25,427 against 8,096).
Read the full AliveCor review and pricing or the ScreenPoint Medical review and pricing. You can also browse other AliveCor alternatives we track.