AliveCor vs Leo Cancer Care
AliveCor vs Leo Cancer Care, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AliveCor is on 64/100 and Leo Cancer Care on 53/100.
Where each one leads
AliveCor
- our overall score: 64/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 209 against 123
- funding raised: $257M against $65.0M
- LinkedIn following: 25,427 against 13,649
Leo Cancer Care
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | AliveCor | Leo Cancer Care |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered ECG sensors and digital cardiac care solutions for continuous heart health monitoring. | Reinventing cancer imaging and treatment through upright patient positioning. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Digital Health | HealthTech, Medical Devices, Oncology, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | Middleton, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AliveCor | Leo Cancer Care |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | 123 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $257M | $65.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series D |
| Valuation | $467M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,427 | 13,649 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AliveCor | Leo Cancer Care |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 44/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AliveCor | Leo Cancer Care |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
AliveCor vs Leo Cancer Care: common questions
Which is better, AliveCor or Leo Cancer Care?
On our 0-100 score AliveCor rates higher (64/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AliveCor and Leo Cancer Care compare on the numbers?
AliveCor leads on our overall score (64/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (37/100 against 21/100), domain rating (67/100 against 44/100), headcount (209 against 123), funding raised ($257M against $65.0M), LinkedIn following (25,427 against 13,649).
Read the full AliveCor review and pricing or the Leo Cancer Care review and pricing. You can also browse other AliveCor alternatives we track.