AliveCor vs Kelda
AliveCor vs Kelda, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AliveCor is on 64/100 and Kelda on 35/100.
Where each one leads
AliveCor
- our overall score: 64/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 12/100
- funding raised: $257M against $1.5M
Kelda
- agent readiness: 72/100 against 37/100
At a glance
| Measure | AliveCor | Kelda |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered ECG sensors and digital cardiac care solutions for continuous heart health monitoring. | Connect your meds, labs, symptoms and wearable data to how you actually feel. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Digital Health | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Biotech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AliveCor | Kelda |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $257M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Series F | Seed |
| Valuation | $467M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,427 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AliveCor | Kelda |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 35/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 31/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | B (72/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 12/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AliveCor | Kelda |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
AliveCor vs Kelda: common questions
Which is better, AliveCor or Kelda?
On our 0-100 score AliveCor rates higher (64/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AliveCor and Kelda compare on the numbers?
AliveCor leads on our overall score (64/100 against 35/100), domain rating (67/100 against 12/100), funding raised ($257M against $1.5M). Kelda leads on agent readiness (72/100 against 37/100).
Read the full AliveCor review and pricing or the Kelda review and pricing. You can also browse other AliveCor alternatives we track.