AliveCor vs Hyperfine
AliveCor vs Hyperfine, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AliveCor is on 64/100 and Hyperfine on 43/100.
Where each one leads
AliveCor
- our overall score: 64/100 against 43/100
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 209 against 124
- funding raised: $257M against $40.0M
Hyperfine
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | AliveCor | Hyperfine |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered ECG sensors and digital cardiac care solutions for continuous heart health monitoring. | Health technology company commercializing the Swoop® System for point-of-care medical imaging. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Digital Health | HealthTech, Medical Devices, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | Farmington, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AliveCor | Hyperfine |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | 124 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $257M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Loan Facility |
| Valuation | $467M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,427 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AliveCor | Hyperfine |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AliveCor | Hyperfine |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
AliveCor vs Hyperfine: common questions
Which is better, AliveCor or Hyperfine?
On our 0-100 score AliveCor rates higher (64/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AliveCor and Hyperfine compare on the numbers?
AliveCor leads on our overall score (64/100 against 43/100), agent readiness (37/100 against 33/100), domain rating (67/100 against 50/100), headcount (209 against 124), funding raised ($257M against $40.0M).
Read the full AliveCor review and pricing or the Hyperfine review and pricing. You can also browse other AliveCor alternatives we track.