AliveCor vs DermaSensor
AliveCor vs DermaSensor, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AliveCor is on 64/100 and DermaSensor on 43/100.
Where each one leads
AliveCor
- our overall score: 64/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $257M against $15.0M
- LinkedIn following: 25,427 against 5,977
DermaSensor
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | AliveCor | DermaSensor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered ECG sensors and digital cardiac care solutions for continuous heart health monitoring. | AI-powered handheld device for early skin cancer detection, aiding dermatologists. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Digital Health | HealthTech, MedTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Computer Vision |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2011 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | Miami, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AliveCor | DermaSensor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $257M | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series A |
| Valuation | $467M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,427 | 5,977 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AliveCor | DermaSensor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AliveCor | DermaSensor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
AliveCor vs DermaSensor: common questions
Which is better, AliveCor or DermaSensor?
On our 0-100 score AliveCor rates higher (64/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AliveCor and DermaSensor compare on the numbers?
AliveCor leads on our overall score (64/100 against 43/100), domain rating (67/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($257M against $15.0M), LinkedIn following (25,427 against 5,977).
Read the full AliveCor review and pricing or the DermaSensor review and pricing. You can also browse other AliveCor alternatives we track.