AliveCor vs CardiacSense
AliveCor vs CardiacSense, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AliveCor is on 64/100 and CardiacSense on 51/100.
Where each one leads
AliveCor
- our overall score: 64/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 209 against 39
- funding raised: $257M against $10.8M
- LinkedIn following: 25,427 against 7,325
CardiacSense
- headcount growth: +3.3% against -5.6%
At a glance
| Measure | AliveCor | CardiacSense |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered ECG sensors and digital cardiac care solutions for continuous heart health monitoring. | CardiacSense develops a CE and FDA-cleared medical watch for continuous cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Digital Health | Healthcare, Digital Health, Sensor, Wearable |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | platform | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AliveCor | CardiacSense |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | 39 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.6% | +3.3% |
| Total funding | $257M | $10.8M |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $467M | $21.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,427 | 7,325 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AliveCor | CardiacSense |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AliveCor | CardiacSense |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | AliveCor | CardiacSense |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads |
“CardiacSense Ltd. CS System 3 is a wristworn medical device that measures heart rate, Pulse Rate and detects atrial fibrillation (AFib) by reading the users PPG and ECG CS322 (2A4CTCS322).”r/FCCID
AliveCor vs CardiacSense: common questions
Which is better, AliveCor or CardiacSense?
On our 0-100 score AliveCor rates higher (64/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AliveCor and CardiacSense compare on the numbers?
AliveCor leads on our overall score (64/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (37/100 against 30/100), domain rating (67/100 against 34/100), headcount (209 against 39), funding raised ($257M against $10.8M), LinkedIn following (25,427 against 7,325). CardiacSense leads on headcount growth (+3.3% against -5.6%).
What do real users say about AliveCor and CardiacSense?
CardiacSense: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FCCID.
Read the full AliveCor review and pricing or the CardiacSense review and pricing. You can also browse other AliveCor alternatives we track.