AliveCor vs Calo
AliveCor vs Calo, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AliveCor is on 64/100 and Calo on 42/100.
Where each one leads
AliveCor
- our overall score: 64/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 47/100
- funding raised: $257M against $40.3M
Calo
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 899 against 209
- LinkedIn following: 316,334 against 25,427
At a glance
| Measure | AliveCor | Calo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered ECG sensors and digital cardiac care solutions for continuous heart health monitoring. | AI-powered platform for personalized nutrition and weight management. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Digital Health | HealthTech, Nutrition, Weight Management, AI-Driven Health |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AliveCor | Calo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | 899 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $257M | $40.3M |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $467M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,427 | 316,334 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AliveCor | Calo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 42/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AliveCor | Calo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Segment |
AliveCor vs Calo: common questions
Which is better, AliveCor or Calo?
On our 0-100 score AliveCor rates higher (64/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AliveCor and Calo compare on the numbers?
AliveCor leads on our overall score (64/100 against 42/100), domain rating (67/100 against 47/100), funding raised ($257M against $40.3M). Calo leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 37/100), headcount (899 against 209), LinkedIn following (316,334 against 25,427).
Read the full AliveCor review and pricing or the Calo review and pricing. You can also browse other AliveCor alternatives we track.