AliveCor vs Binah.ai
AliveCor vs Binah.ai, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AliveCor is on 64/100 and Binah.ai on 58/100.
Where each one leads
AliveCor
- our overall score: 64/100 against 58/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 209 against 45
- headcount growth: -5.6% against -14.3%
- funding raised: $257M against $13.5M
- LinkedIn following: 25,427 against 10,565
Binah.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | AliveCor | Binah.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered ECG sensors and digital cardiac care solutions for continuous heart health monitoring. | AI-powered video health data platform for remote vital sign monitoring via smartphone. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Digital Health | Healthcare, Video, Monitor, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | services | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AliveCor | Binah.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 209 | 45 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.6% | -14.3% |
| Total funding | $257M | $13.5M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series B |
| Valuation | $467M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,427 | 10,565 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AliveCor | Binah.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AliveCor | Binah.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
AliveCor vs Binah.ai: common questions
Which is better, AliveCor or Binah.ai?
On our 0-100 score AliveCor rates higher (64/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AliveCor and Binah.ai compare on the numbers?
AliveCor leads on our overall score (64/100 against 58/100), domain rating (67/100 against 52/100), headcount (209 against 45), headcount growth (-5.6% against -14.3%), funding raised ($257M against $13.5M), LinkedIn following (25,427 against 10,565).
Read the full AliveCor review and pricing or the Binah.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other AliveCor alternatives we track.