Algolia vs Qurate.tech
Algolia vs Qurate.tech, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Algolia is on 63/100 and Qurate.tech on 17/100.
Where each one leads
Algolia
- our overall score: 63/100 against 17/100
- agent readiness: 65/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 6/100
- headcount: 858 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 72,696 against 336
Qurate.tech
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Algolia | Qurate.tech |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | SaaS search platform for websites and applications, offering AI-powered search and discovery solutions. | AI and big data platform personalizing DIY, cooking, and crafting retail experiences. |
| Category | Search Technology, AI Search Engine, Search and Discovery Platform, E-commerce Search | Recommendation Engine, Retail, Food, ML |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Algolia | Qurate.tech |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 858 | 4 |
| Total funding | $334M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.3B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 72,696 | 336 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Algolia | Qurate.tech |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 17/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 7/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (65/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 6/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Algolia | Qurate.tech |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Segment, Amplitude | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Algolia vs Qurate.tech: common questions
Which is better, Algolia or Qurate.tech?
On our 0-100 score Algolia rates higher (63/100 against 17/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Algolia and Qurate.tech compare on the numbers?
Algolia leads on our overall score (63/100 against 17/100), agent readiness (65/100 against 51/100), domain rating (88/100 against 6/100), headcount (858 against 4), LinkedIn following (72,696 against 336).
Read the full Algolia review and pricing or the Qurate.tech review and pricing. You can also browse other Algolia alternatives we track.