Alchemy vs QuickNode
Alchemy vs QuickNode, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Alchemy is on 67/100 and QuickNode on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Alchemy
- our overall score: 67/100 against 62/100
- funding raised: $450M against $95.0M
QuickNode
- agent readiness: 77/100 against 66/100
- headcount: 122 against 41
At a glance
| Measure | Alchemy | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading blockchain developer platform providing infrastructure, APIs, and tools to build scalable Web3 applications. | Blockchain infrastructure provider offering high-performance RPC nodes and developer tools for Web3 applications. |
| Category | Blockchain, Web3, SaaS, Infrastructure | Blockchain, Web3, SaaS, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Miami, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Alchemy | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 41 | 122 |
| Total funding | $450M | $95.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | $10B | $800M |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Alchemy | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | B (77/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Alchemy | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Not detected | Stripe |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Analytics 4, Segment |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Discourse |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Visa Intelligent Commerce | X402 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Alchemy vs QuickNode: common questions
Which is better, Alchemy or QuickNode?
On our 0-100 score Alchemy rates higher (67/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Alchemy and QuickNode compare on the numbers?
Alchemy leads on our overall score (67/100 against 62/100), funding raised ($450M against $95.0M). QuickNode leads on agent readiness (77/100 against 66/100), headcount (122 against 41).
Read the full Alchemy review and pricing or the QuickNode review and pricing. You can also browse other Alchemy alternatives we track.