Alchemy vs Lava Network
Alchemy vs Lava Network, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Alchemy is on 67/100 and Lava Network on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Alchemy
- our overall score: 67/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 81/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 41 against 24
- funding raised: $450M against $27.0M
Lava Network
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Alchemy | Lava Network |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading blockchain developer platform providing infrastructure, APIs, and tools to build scalable Web3 applications. | Decentralized blockchain infrastructure protocol for reliable data access, especially for AI agents and dApps. |
| Category | Blockchain, Web3, SaaS, Infrastructure | Blockchain, Infrastructure, Blockchain Infrastructure, Decentralized Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Wilmington, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Alchemy | Lava Network |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 41 | 24 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -5.7% |
| Total funding | $450M | $27.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $10B | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 3,705 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Alchemy | Lava Network |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Alchemy | Lava Network |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Visa Intelligent Commerce | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Alchemy vs Lava Network: common questions
Which is better, Alchemy or Lava Network?
On our 0-100 score Alchemy rates higher (67/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Alchemy and Lava Network compare on the numbers?
Alchemy leads on our overall score (67/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 41/100), domain rating (81/100 against 55/100), headcount (41 against 24), funding raised ($450M against $27.0M).
Read the full Alchemy review and pricing or the Lava Network review and pricing. You can also browse other Alchemy alternatives we track.