Akita.Cloud vs Guard.io
Akita.Cloud vs Guard.io, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Akita.Cloud is on 19/100 and Guard.io on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Akita.Cloud
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Guard.io
- our overall score: 63/100 against 19/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 1/100
At a glance
| Measure | Akita.Cloud | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Protects home IoT devices from cyberattacks, including botnets and AI-powered threats. | Browser security extension protecting users from phishing, scams, and malicious extensions. |
| Category | Personal, Smart Home, Cybersecurity, IoT Security | Cybersecurity, Personal, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Akita.Cloud | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 152 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +71.2% |
| Total funding | Not published | $47.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 21,366 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Akita.Cloud | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 19/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Akita.Cloud | Guard.io |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
Akita.Cloud vs Guard.io: common questions
Which is better, Akita.Cloud or Guard.io?
On our 0-100 score Guard.io rates higher (63/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Akita.Cloud and Guard.io compare on the numbers?
Guard.io leads on our overall score (63/100 against 19/100), domain rating (71/100 against 1/100).
Read the full Akita.Cloud review and pricing or the Guard.io review and pricing. You can also browse other Akita.Cloud alternatives we track.