Akave vs Wasabi Technologies
Akave vs Wasabi Technologies, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Akave is on 56/100 and Wasabi Technologies on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Akave
- our overall score: 56/100 against 47/100
- LinkedIn following: 663 against 115
Wasabi Technologies
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 300 against 15
- funding raised: $250M against $6.7M
At a glance
| Measure | Akave | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Compute-agnostic, egress-free cloud object storage for enterprises focused on AI. | Cloud storage provider offering affordable, high-performance, and secure object storage. |
| Category | Cloud Computing, Data Storage, Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence | Cloud Storage, Cloud Infrastructure, Data Storage, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Boston, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Akave | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 300 |
| Total funding | $6.7M | $250M |
| Latest round | Seed | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 663 | 115 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Akave | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 32/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Akave | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
Akave vs Wasabi Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Akave or Wasabi Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Akave rates higher (56/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Akave and Wasabi Technologies compare on the numbers?
Akave leads on our overall score (56/100 against 47/100), LinkedIn following (663 against 115). Wasabi Technologies leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 45/100), domain rating (78/100 against 32/100), headcount (300 against 15), funding raised ($250M against $6.7M).
Read the full Akave review and pricing or the Wasabi Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Akave alternatives we track.