AISAP vs CathWorks
AISAP vs CathWorks, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AISAP is on 56/100 and CathWorks on 62/100.
Where each one leads
AISAP
- headcount growth: +50.5% against +5.6%
CathWorks
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 28/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 80 against 39
- funding raised: $156M against $13.0M
- LinkedIn following: 12,341 against 5,615
At a glance
| Measure | AISAP | CathWorks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for real-time medical diagnosis, interpretation, and reporting. | Medical technology company optimizing coronary artery disease therapy decisions with FFR-based assessment. |
| Category | Healthcare, Ultrasound, Medical Imaging, Point of care | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, 3D, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AISAP | CathWorks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 80 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +50.5% | +5.6% |
| Total funding | $13.0M | $156M |
| Latest round | Seed | Strategic |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,615 | 12,341 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AISAP | CathWorks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 22/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AISAP | CathWorks |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
AISAP vs CathWorks: common questions
Which is better, AISAP or CathWorks?
On our 0-100 score CathWorks rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AISAP and CathWorks compare on the numbers?
AISAP leads on headcount growth (+50.5% against +5.6%). CathWorks leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), domain rating (28/100 against 22/100), headcount (80 against 39), funding raised ($156M against $13.0M), LinkedIn following (12,341 against 5,615).
Read the full AISAP review and pricing or the CathWorks review and pricing. You can also browse other AISAP alternatives we track.