Airweave vs Mem0
Airweave vs Mem0, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Airweave is on 61/100 and Mem0 on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Airweave
- our overall score: 61/100 against 56/100
Mem0
- domain rating: 74/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 21 against 8
- funding raised: $24.0M against $6.0M
- LinkedIn following: 18,584 against 3,344
At a glance
| Measure | Airweave | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source tool to transform application data into accessible knowledge for AI agents. | Persistent memory layer for AI agents and applications. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent Data Infrastructure, AI Agent, AI Infrastructure | Agentic AI, AI Infrastructure, Foundation Model, Retrieval Augmented Generation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Airweave | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 21 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -37.6% |
| Total funding | $6.0M | $24.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,344 | 18,584 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Airweave | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 49/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (56/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Airweave | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Framer |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Open source | Yes, 2,800 GitHub stars | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Airweave | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | White-Labeled Multi-Tenant Support, 100+ Connectors, Unified Agentic Search Layer, Automated Sync, Scalable Deployments, No Code Required | Not published |
Airweave vs Mem0: common questions
Which is better, Airweave or Mem0?
On our 0-100 score Airweave rates higher (61/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Airweave and Mem0 compare on the numbers?
Airweave leads on our overall score (61/100 against 56/100). Mem0 leads on domain rating (74/100 against 48/100), headcount (21 against 8), funding raised ($24.0M against $6.0M), LinkedIn following (18,584 against 3,344).
Read the full Airweave review and pricing or the Mem0 review and pricing. You can also browse other Airweave alternatives we track.