Airweave vs LangChain
Airweave vs LangChain, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Airweave is on 61/100 and LangChain on 76/100.
Where each one leads
Airweave
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 42/100
LangChain
- our overall score: 76/100 against 61/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 312 against 8
- funding raised: $260M against $6.0M
- LinkedIn following: 514,641 against 3,344
At a glance
| Measure | Airweave | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source tool to transform application data into accessible knowledge for AI agents. | The platform for building reliable AI agents and LLM applications. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent Data Infrastructure, AI Agent, AI Infrastructure | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Large Language Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Airweave | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 312 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +260.4% |
| Total funding | $6.0M | $260M |
| Valuation | Not published | $1K |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,344 | 514,641 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Airweave | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 84/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 83/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (56/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Airweave | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Plausible |
| Open source | Yes, 2,800 GitHub stars | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Airweave | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | White-Labeled Multi-Tenant Support, 100+ Connectors, Unified Agentic Search Layer, Automated Sync, Scalable Deployments, No Code Required | Not published |
Airweave vs LangChain: common questions
Which is better, Airweave or LangChain?
On our 0-100 score LangChain rates higher (76/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Airweave and LangChain compare on the numbers?
Airweave leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 42/100). LangChain leads on our overall score (76/100 against 61/100), domain rating (86/100 against 48/100), headcount (312 against 8), funding raised ($260M against $6.0M), LinkedIn following (514,641 against 3,344).
Read the full Airweave review and pricing or the LangChain review and pricing. You can also browse other Airweave alternatives we track.