AironWorks vs Exabeam
AironWorks vs Exabeam, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AironWorks is on 48/100 and Exabeam on 69/100.
Where each one leads
AironWorks
- headcount growth: +23.9% against +2.8%
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 794 against 15
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 354
At a glance
| Measure | AironWorks | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform that generates automated attack simulations to test cybersecurity defenses. | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Training, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Foster City, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AironWorks | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 794 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +23.9% | +2.8% |
| Total funding | Not published | $390M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 354 | 51,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AironWorks | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AironWorks | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
| Open source | No | Yes |
AironWorks vs Exabeam: common questions
Which is better, AironWorks or Exabeam?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AironWorks and Exabeam compare on the numbers?
AironWorks leads on headcount growth (+23.9% against +2.8%). Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 22/100), domain rating (76/100 against 42/100), headcount (794 against 15), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 354).
Read the full AironWorks review and pricing or the Exabeam review and pricing. You can also browse other AironWorks alternatives we track.