AirEye vs Guardicore
AirEye vs Guardicore, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AirEye is on 55/100 and Guardicore on 60/100.
Where each one leads
AirEye
- agent readiness: 32/100 against 25/100
Guardicore
- our overall score: 60/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 60 against 12
- funding raised: $112M against $8.0M
- LinkedIn following: 14,681 against 1,746
At a glance
| Measure | AirEye | Guardicore |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity solution providing full protection against digital airborne attacks. | Guardicore provides microsegmentation and breach detection software to protect data centers and cloud environments. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, WiFi, Enterprise, Threat Detection | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Network Security, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AirEye | Guardicore |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 60 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -25.8% | -25.5% |
| Total funding | $8.0M | $112M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,746 | 14,681 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AirEye | Guardicore |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AirEye | Guardicore |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
AirEye vs Guardicore: common questions
Which is better, AirEye or Guardicore?
On our 0-100 score Guardicore rates higher (60/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AirEye and Guardicore compare on the numbers?
AirEye leads on agent readiness (32/100 against 25/100). Guardicore leads on our overall score (60/100 against 55/100), domain rating (70/100 against 27/100), headcount (60 against 12), funding raised ($112M against $8.0M), LinkedIn following (14,681 against 1,746).
Read the full AirEye review and pricing or the Guardicore review and pricing. You can also browse other AirEye alternatives we track.