AirEye vs Cisco
AirEye vs Cisco, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AirEye is on 55/100 and Cisco on 83/100.
Where each one leads
AirEye
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 12
- headcount growth: +4.2% against -25.8%
- funding raised: $220B against $8.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 1,746
At a glance
| Measure | AirEye | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity solution providing full protection against digital airborne attacks. | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions |
| Category | Cybersecurity, WiFi, Enterprise, Threat Detection | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B Hardware / SaaS |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AirEye | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 95,924 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -25.8% | +4.2% |
| Total funding | $8.0M | $220B |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $240B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,746 | 7,660,767 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AirEye | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 83/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 67/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AirEye | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
AirEye vs Cisco: common questions
Which is better, AirEye or Cisco?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AirEye and Cisco compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 32/100), domain rating (91/100 against 27/100), headcount (95,924 against 12), headcount growth (+4.2% against -25.8%), funding raised ($220B against $8.0M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 1,746).
Read the full AirEye review and pricing or the Cisco review and pricing. You can also browse other AirEye alternatives we track.