AIR vs Gray Swan
AIR vs Gray Swan, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AIR is on 57/100 and Gray Swan on 63/100.
Where each one leads
AIR
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Gray Swan
- our overall score: 63/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 81 against 27
- LinkedIn following: 7,116 against 2,118
At a glance
| Measure | AIR | Gray Swan |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building an inline firewall for AI agents to protect enterprises from untrusted tools, plugins, and injected instructions. | Gray Swan provides enterprise-grade security solutions for LLMs, developed by the pioneers of AI vulnerability research, enabling confident AI deployment. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, AI Security, Enterprise Software, AI Agents | Cybersecurity, AI Safety, AI Alignment, Large Language Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2026 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | New York City, United States | Pittsburgh, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AIR | Gray Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 27 | 81 |
| Total funding | $50.0M | $45.7M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $200M |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,118 | 7,116 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AIR | Gray Swan |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 72/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AIR | Gray Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | PostHog |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | AIR | Gray Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 5 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads |
“Gray Swan AI—where AI security meets the underground. This is the proving ground for red teamers, hackers, & AI skeptics pushing models to their limits. Jailbreak, exploit, & expose vulnerabilities in cutting-edge AI systems.”r/
AIR vs Gray Swan: common questions
Which is better, AIR or Gray Swan?
On our 0-100 score Gray Swan rates higher (63/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AIR and Gray Swan compare on the numbers?
Gray Swan leads on our overall score (63/100 against 57/100), domain rating (64/100 against 44/100), headcount (81 against 27), LinkedIn following (7,116 against 2,118).
What do real users say about AIR and Gray Swan?
Gray Swan: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full AIR review and pricing or the Gray Swan review and pricing. You can also browse other AIR alternatives we track.