Aikido Security vs ThreatX
Aikido Security vs ThreatX, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aikido Security is on 65/100 and ThreatX on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Aikido Security
- our overall score: 65/100 against 56/100
- funding raised: $84.4M against $53.7M
- LinkedIn following: 35,410 against 9,199
ThreatX
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 7/100
At a glance
| Measure | Aikido Security | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developer-first security platform providing continuous AI-driven penetration testing and vulnerability remediation. | Cloud-native WAAP solution for API and application security, providing real-time visibility and protection against evolving threats. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, Artificial Intelligence, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, API Security, Application Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Ghent, Belgium | Denver, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aikido Security | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 14 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -52.2% |
| Total funding | $84.4M | $53.7M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 35,410 | 9,199 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aikido Security | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 6/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 7/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aikido Security | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Zendesk |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Aikido Security vs ThreatX: common questions
Which is better, Aikido Security or ThreatX?
On our 0-100 score Aikido Security rates higher (65/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aikido Security and ThreatX compare on the numbers?
Aikido Security leads on our overall score (65/100 against 56/100), funding raised ($84.4M against $53.7M), LinkedIn following (35,410 against 9,199). ThreatX leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 22/100), domain rating (55/100 against 7/100).
Read the full Aikido Security review and pricing or the ThreatX review and pricing. You can also browse other Aikido Security alternatives we track.