Agurotech vs CropX
Agurotech vs CropX, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agurotech is on 45/100 and CropX on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Agurotech
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
CropX
- our overall score: 58/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 134 against 23
- funding raised: $50.4M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 27,973 against 8,883
At a glance
| Measure | Agurotech | CropX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops hardware and software for data-driven farming. | CropX provides an agronomic farm management system that synthesizes data from soil to sky for advanced soil and crop intelligence. |
| Category | Agritech, Precision Agriculture, IoT, Data Analytics | Agritech, Analytics, Irrigation, Digital Twin |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agurotech | CropX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 23 | 134 |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $50.4M |
| Latest round | Seed | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,883 | 27,973 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agurotech | CropX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 44/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 37/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agurotech | CropX |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight |
Agurotech vs CropX: common questions
Which is better, Agurotech or CropX?
On our 0-100 score CropX rates higher (58/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agurotech and CropX compare on the numbers?
CropX leads on our overall score (58/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 30/100), domain rating (59/100 against 37/100), headcount (134 against 23), funding raised ($50.4M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (27,973 against 8,883).
Read the full Agurotech review and pricing or the CropX review and pricing. You can also browse other Agurotech alternatives we track.