AgroSmart vs SupPlant
AgroSmart vs SupPlant, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AgroSmart is on 54/100 and SupPlant on 66/100.
Where each one leads
AgroSmart
- domain rating: 44/100 against 38/100
- LinkedIn following: 33,357 against 15,340
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 42/100
- funding raised: $62.9M against $6.9M
At a glance
| Measure | AgroSmart | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Integrates satellite imagery with IoT sensors for precision irrigation and crop management. | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. |
| Category | AgTech, FoodTech, Precision Agriculture, IoT | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Campinas, Morocco | Afula, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AgroSmart | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 64 | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -13.4% |
| Total funding | $6.9M | $62.9M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 33,357 | 15,340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AgroSmart | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AgroSmart | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
AgroSmart vs SupPlant: common questions
Which is better, AgroSmart or SupPlant?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AgroSmart and SupPlant compare on the numbers?
AgroSmart leads on domain rating (44/100 against 38/100), LinkedIn following (33,357 against 15,340). SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 42/100), funding raised ($62.9M against $6.9M).
Read the full AgroSmart review and pricing or the SupPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other AgroSmart alternatives we track.