AgroFresh vs Tridge
AgroFresh vs Tridge, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AgroFresh is on 57/100 and Tridge on 61/100.
Where each one leads
AgroFresh
- headcount: 722 against 250
- funding raised: $150M against $97.2M
Tridge
- our overall score: 61/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 49/100
- LinkedIn following: 91,877 against 38,510
At a glance
| Measure | AgroFresh | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in post-harvest solutions for fresh produce, reducing food loss and waste. | Global B2B marketplace and intelligence platform for the food, agriculture, and marine industries. |
| Category | AgTech, FoodTech, Post-Harvest Solutions, Produce Quality | AgTech, FoodTech, Supply Chain, LogisticsTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | Platform |
| Founded | 1996 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Philadelphia, United States | Seoul, South Korea |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AgroFresh | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 722 | 250 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -15.9% |
| Total funding | $150M | $97.2M |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.7B |
| LinkedIn followers | 38,510 | 91,877 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AgroFresh | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AgroFresh | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Graphql |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | AgroFresh | Tridge |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 4.0/5 from 1 vote |
AgroFresh vs Tridge: common questions
Which is better, AgroFresh or Tridge?
On our 0-100 score Tridge rates higher (61/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AgroFresh and Tridge compare on the numbers?
AgroFresh leads on headcount (722 against 250), funding raised ($150M against $97.2M). Tridge leads on our overall score (61/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 39/100), domain rating (67/100 against 49/100), LinkedIn following (91,877 against 38,510).
Read the full AgroFresh review and pricing or the Tridge review and pricing. You can also browse other AgroFresh alternatives we track.