Agriot Group vs Treetoscope
Agriot Group vs Treetoscope, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agriot Group is on 43/100 and Treetoscope on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Agriot Group
- headcount growth: +126.5% against +35.0%
Treetoscope
- our overall score: 56/100 against 43/100
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 29/100 against 6/100
- headcount: 40 against 9
- funding raised: $7.0M against $2.0M
- LinkedIn following: 5,811 against 278
At a glance
| Measure | Agriot Group | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agri-IoT company using smartphone cameras for plant nitrogen uptake analysis. | Agritech company developing a device to measure plant water consumption and irrigation needs. |
| Category | Agritech, Crop Analysis, App, Fertilization | Agritech, Sensor, Irrigation, AgTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agriot Group | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +126.5% | +35.0% |
| Total funding | $2.0M | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 278 | 5,811 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agriot Group | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 42/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 6/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agriot Group | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Agriot Group vs Treetoscope: common questions
Which is better, Agriot Group or Treetoscope?
On our 0-100 score Treetoscope rates higher (56/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agriot Group and Treetoscope compare on the numbers?
Agriot Group leads on headcount growth (+126.5% against +35.0%). Treetoscope leads on our overall score (56/100 against 43/100), agent readiness (36/100 against 29/100), domain rating (29/100 against 6/100), headcount (40 against 9), funding raised ($7.0M against $2.0M), LinkedIn following (5,811 against 278).
Read the full Agriot Group review and pricing or the Treetoscope review and pricing. You can also browse other Agriot Group alternatives we track.