Agrint vs Treetoscope
Agrint vs Treetoscope, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agrint is on 43/100 and Treetoscope on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Agrint
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Treetoscope
- our overall score: 56/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 29/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 40 against 18
- funding raised: $7.0M against $100K
- LinkedIn following: 5,811 against 1,925
At a glance
| Measure | Agrint | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agrint develops AI-driven sensors for early detection of tree infestations, protecting crops from within. | Agritech company developing a device to measure plant water consumption and irrigation needs. |
| Category | Agritech, Pest Control, Pest, Sensor | Agritech, Sensor, Irrigation, AgTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agrint | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +35.0% |
| Total funding | $100K | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Grant | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,925 | 5,811 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agrint | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agrint | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Agrint vs Treetoscope: common questions
Which is better, Agrint or Treetoscope?
On our 0-100 score Treetoscope rates higher (56/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agrint and Treetoscope compare on the numbers?
Treetoscope leads on our overall score (56/100 against 43/100), domain rating (29/100 against 25/100), headcount (40 against 18), funding raised ($7.0M against $100K), LinkedIn following (5,811 against 1,925).
Read the full Agrint review and pricing or the Treetoscope review and pricing. You can also browse other Agrint alternatives we track.