Agrint vs InnerPlant
Agrint vs InnerPlant, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agrint is on 43/100 and InnerPlant on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Agrint
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
InnerPlant
- our overall score: 62/100 against 43/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 42/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 49 against 18
- funding raised: $51.7M against $100K
- LinkedIn following: 9,617 against 1,925
At a glance
| Measure | Agrint | InnerPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agrint develops AI-driven sensors for early detection of tree infestations, protecting crops from within. | Agritech startup using optical sensors to enable crops to communicate their needs. |
| Category | Agritech, Pest Control, Pest, Sensor | Agritech, Sensor, Nutrient, Crop |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Davis, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agrint | InnerPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 49 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +18.1% |
| Total funding | $100K | $51.7M |
| Latest round | Grant | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,925 | 9,617 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agrint | InnerPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agrint | InnerPlant |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
Agrint vs InnerPlant: common questions
Which is better, Agrint or InnerPlant?
On our 0-100 score InnerPlant rates higher (62/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agrint and InnerPlant compare on the numbers?
InnerPlant leads on our overall score (62/100 against 43/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 36/100), domain rating (42/100 against 25/100), headcount (49 against 18), funding raised ($51.7M against $100K), LinkedIn following (9,617 against 1,925).
Read the full Agrint review and pricing or the InnerPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other Agrint alternatives we track.