Agrint vs CropX
Agrint vs CropX, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agrint is on 43/100 and CropX on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Agrint
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
CropX
- our overall score: 58/100 against 43/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 134 against 18
- funding raised: $50.4M against $100K
- LinkedIn following: 27,973 against 1,925
At a glance
| Measure | Agrint | CropX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agrint develops AI-driven sensors for early detection of tree infestations, protecting crops from within. | CropX provides an agronomic farm management system that synthesizes data from soil to sky for advanced soil and crop intelligence. |
| Category | Agritech, Pest Control, Pest, Sensor | Agritech, Analytics, Irrigation, Digital Twin |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agrint | CropX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 134 |
| Total funding | $100K | $50.4M |
| Latest round | Grant | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,925 | 27,973 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agrint | CropX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agrint | CropX |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight |
Agrint vs CropX: common questions
Which is better, Agrint or CropX?
On our 0-100 score CropX rates higher (58/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agrint and CropX compare on the numbers?
CropX leads on our overall score (58/100 against 43/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 36/100), domain rating (59/100 against 25/100), headcount (134 against 18), funding raised ($50.4M against $100K), LinkedIn following (27,973 against 1,925).
Read the full Agrint review and pricing or the CropX review and pricing. You can also browse other Agrint alternatives we track.