Agrinoze vs Treetoscope
Agrinoze vs Treetoscope, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agrinoze is on 51/100 and Treetoscope on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Agrinoze
- funding raised: $10.0M against $7.0M
Treetoscope
- our overall score: 56/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 29/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 40 against 6
- headcount growth: +35.0% against -9.0%
- LinkedIn following: 5,811 against 1,488
At a glance
| Measure | Agrinoze | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Autonomous irrigation and fertigation solution for food security and resource conservation. | Agritech company developing a device to measure plant water consumption and irrigation needs. |
| Category | Agritech, Irrigation, AgTech, FoodTech | Agritech, Sensor, Irrigation, AgTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agrinoze | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -9.0% | +35.0% |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,488 | 5,811 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agrinoze | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 5/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agrinoze | Treetoscope |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Agrinoze vs Treetoscope: common questions
Which is better, Agrinoze or Treetoscope?
On our 0-100 score Treetoscope rates higher (56/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agrinoze and Treetoscope compare on the numbers?
Agrinoze leads on funding raised ($10.0M against $7.0M). Treetoscope leads on our overall score (56/100 against 51/100), domain rating (29/100 against 5/100), headcount (40 against 6), headcount growth (+35.0% against -9.0%), LinkedIn following (5,811 against 1,488).
Read the full Agrinoze review and pricing or the Treetoscope review and pricing. You can also browse other Agrinoze alternatives we track.