Agrematch vs Fermata
Agrematch vs Fermata, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agrematch is on 40/100 and Fermata on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Agrematch
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Fermata
- our overall score: 54/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 31/100 against 6/100
- headcount: 40 against 19
- headcount growth: +50.3% against +1.2%
- LinkedIn following: 5,797 against 1,846
At a glance
| Measure | Agrematch | Fermata |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered discovery and development of sustainable active ingredients for the Ag & Food industries. | AI-powered plant monitoring solutions for precise greenhouse management. |
| Category | Agritech, Machine Learning, Discovery, Biotech | Agritech, Disease Control, Crop Monitoring, Greenhouse |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Rehovot, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agrematch | Fermata |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.2% | +50.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,846 | 5,797 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agrematch | Fermata |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 13/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 6/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agrematch | Fermata |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Astro, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | PostHog |
What users say
| Measure | Agrematch | Fermata |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“ICL Group partners with AI startup Agrematch to harness AI's potential in AgriTech.”r/Multiplatform_AI
Agrematch vs Fermata: common questions
Which is better, Agrematch or Fermata?
On our 0-100 score Fermata rates higher (54/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agrematch and Fermata compare on the numbers?
Fermata leads on our overall score (54/100 against 40/100), domain rating (31/100 against 6/100), headcount (40 against 19), headcount growth (+50.3% against +1.2%), LinkedIn following (5,797 against 1,846).
What do real users say about Agrematch and Fermata?
Agrematch: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Multiplatform_AI.
Read the full Agrematch review and pricing or the Fermata review and pricing. You can also browse other Agrematch alternatives we track.