Agora.io vs Cisco
Agora.io vs Cisco, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agora.io is on 65/100 and Cisco on 83/100.
Where each one leads
Agora.io
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 65/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 915
- funding raised: $220B against $706M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 52,836
At a glance
| Measure | Agora.io | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time engagement platform for developers building voice, video, and live streaming experiences. | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions |
| Category | Real-Time Engagement, Video Conferencing, Live Streaming, Communication APIs | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B Hardware / SaaS |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2014 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, United States | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agora.io | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 915 | 95,924 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +4.2% |
| Total funding | $706M | $220B |
| Latest round | Series F | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $240B |
| LinkedIn followers | 52,836 | 7,660,767 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agora.io | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 83/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 67/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agora.io | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Agora.io vs Cisco: common questions
Which is better, Agora.io or Cisco?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agora.io and Cisco compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 65/100), domain rating (91/100 against 78/100), headcount (95,924 against 915), funding raised ($220B against $706M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 52,836).
Read the full Agora.io review and pricing or the Cisco review and pricing. You can also browse other Agora.io alternatives we track.