Aggreko vs New Fortress Energy
Aggreko vs New Fortress Energy, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aggreko is on 75/100 and New Fortress Energy on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Aggreko
- our overall score: 75/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 8,721 against 582
New Fortress Energy
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Aggreko | New Fortress Energy |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global provider of modular, mobile power, heating, and cooling equipment for temporary industrial needs. | An energy infrastructure company focused on providing clean and affordable natural gas. |
| Category | Energy, Industrial, Infrastructure, Data Center | Energy, Utilities, Infrastructure, Oil & Gas |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1962 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Glasgow, United Kingdom | New York, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aggreko | New Fortress Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,721 | 582 |
| Total funding | Not published | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Strategic |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 65,876 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aggreko | New Fortress Energy |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 75/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 10/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 45/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aggreko | New Fortress Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Fathom | Not detected |
Aggreko vs New Fortress Energy: common questions
Which is better, Aggreko or New Fortress Energy?
On our 0-100 score Aggreko rates higher (75/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aggreko and New Fortress Energy compare on the numbers?
Aggreko leads on our overall score (75/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 39/100), domain rating (68/100 against 52/100), headcount (8,721 against 582).
Read the full Aggreko review and pricing or the New Fortress Energy review and pricing. You can also browse other Aggreko alternatives we track.