AgentVI vs Material Model (YC S25)
AgentVI vs Material Model (YC S25), compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AgentVI is on 51/100 and Material Model (YC S25) on 50/100.
Where each one leads
AgentVI
- domain rating: 50/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 22 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 5,862 against 385
Material Model (YC S25)
- funding raised: $501M against $11.0M
At a glance
| Measure | AgentVI | Material Model (YC S25) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Irisity provides AI-powered video analytics solutions for enhanced security, safety, and operational efficiency across various industries. | Transforms existing cameras and smart devices into LLM-connected intelligent sensors for visual recognition. |
| Category | Computer Vision, Image, Video Recognition, Video | Computer Vision, LLM-based AI, Smart Sensors, IoT |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2003 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Gothenburg, Sweden | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AgentVI | Material Model (YC S25) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22 | 2 |
| Total funding | $11.0M | $501M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,862 | 385 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AgentVI | Material Model (YC S25) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AgentVI | Material Model (YC S25) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Google Cloud |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4, PostHog |
Product and pricing
| Measure | AgentVI | Material Model (YC S25) |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | LLM-based AI, Real-time monitoring, Device communication, No new hardware needed, Customizable instructions, State-of-the-art computer vision |
AgentVI vs Material Model (YC S25): common questions
Which is better, AgentVI or Material Model (YC S25)?
On our 0-100 score AgentVI rates higher (51/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AgentVI and Material Model (YC S25) compare on the numbers?
AgentVI leads on domain rating (50/100 against 10/100), headcount (22 against 2), LinkedIn following (5,862 against 385). Material Model (YC S25) leads on funding raised ($501M against $11.0M).
Read the full AgentVI review and pricing or the Material Model (YC S25) review and pricing. You can also browse other AgentVI alternatives we track.