Agency vs RecursiveMAS
Agency vs RecursiveMAS, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agency is on 58/100 and RecursiveMAS on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Agency
- our overall score: 58/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 519 against 10
- funding raised: $20.0M against $1.5M
RecursiveMAS
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 94/100 against 27/100
At a glance
| Measure | Agency | RecursiveMAS |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agency builds custom AI Agents that operate 24/7/365, offering consulting, development tools, and an observability platform to help businesses automate. | A framework enabling AI agents to collaborate and transmit information through embedding space instead of text, leading to efficiency and performance. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Autonomous Systems, Consulting | Agentic AI, Multi-Agent Systems, Foundation Model, Large Language Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agency | RecursiveMAS |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 519 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -2.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,597 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agency | RecursiveMAS |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 41/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 94/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agency | RecursiveMAS |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Fastly |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Agency | RecursiveMAS |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Custom AI Agent Building, AI Agent Consulting Services, AgentOps Observability Platform, Vetted AI Agents Directory, Rapid Workflow Automation, Cost Reduction & Revenue Boost | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Agency | RecursiveMAS |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Edit: https://github.com/RecursiveMAS/RecursiveMAS Looks like this is already a thing Hybrid AI Architecture 1. Local vs. Cloud AI Aspect Local AI Cloud AI Speed Slower Faster Model size Smaller (often “dumber”) Larger, more capable Privacy”r/LocalLLaMA
Agency vs RecursiveMAS: common questions
Which is better, Agency or RecursiveMAS?
On our 0-100 score Agency rates higher (58/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agency and RecursiveMAS compare on the numbers?
Agency leads on our overall score (58/100 against 44/100), headcount (519 against 10), funding raised ($20.0M against $1.5M). RecursiveMAS leads on agent readiness (58/100 against 35/100), domain rating (94/100 against 27/100).
What do real users say about Agency and RecursiveMAS?
RecursiveMAS: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/LocalLLaMA.
Read the full Agency review and pricing or the RecursiveMAS review and pricing. You can also browse other Agency alternatives we track.