Agamon vs CellaVision
Agamon vs CellaVision, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Agamon is on 55/100 and CellaVision on 30/100.
Where each one leads
Agamon
- our overall score: 55/100 against 30/100
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 35/100
CellaVision
- domain rating: 49/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 250 against 16
- LinkedIn following: 19,143 against 3,592
At a glance
| Measure | Agamon | CellaVision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agamon automates radiology follow-up and closes the loop on critical findings using AI. | AI-driven digital hematology microscopy for clinical labs. |
| Category | AI Enablers, Data, Data Provider, Healthcare | Medical Imaging, Healthcare AI, Hematology, Deep Learning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | hardware | services |
| Founded | 2017 | 1994 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Lund, Sweden |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Agamon | CellaVision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 16 | 250 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $8.4M | Not published |
| Latest round | Strategic | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,592 | 19,143 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Agamon | CellaVision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 30/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Agamon | CellaVision |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Analytics | Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
Agamon vs CellaVision: common questions
Which is better, Agamon or CellaVision?
On our 0-100 score Agamon rates higher (55/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Agamon and CellaVision compare on the numbers?
Agamon leads on our overall score (55/100 against 30/100), agent readiness (40/100 against 35/100). CellaVision leads on domain rating (49/100 against 25/100), headcount (250 against 16), LinkedIn following (19,143 against 3,592).
Read the full Agamon review and pricing or the CellaVision review and pricing. You can also browse other Agamon alternatives we track.