Affective Markets vs NeuroApplied
Affective Markets vs NeuroApplied, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Affective Markets is on 40/100 and NeuroApplied on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Affective Markets
- our overall score: 40/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 4 against 2
- funding raised: $1.0M against $700K
NeuroApplied
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Affective Markets | NeuroApplied |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered marketing research predicting emotional response to new products for SMBs. | Applies AI and subconscious insights from online games for customer-focused marketing. |
| Category | Marketing, Predictive Analytics, MarTech, AdTech | Marketing, Insights, MarTech, AdTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Affective Markets | NeuroApplied |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 2 |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $700K |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 192 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Affective Markets | NeuroApplied |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 34/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 4/100 | 4/100 |
Affective Markets vs NeuroApplied: common questions
Which is better, Affective Markets or NeuroApplied?
On our 0-100 score Affective Markets rates higher (40/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Affective Markets and NeuroApplied compare on the numbers?
Affective Markets leads on our overall score (40/100 against 38/100), headcount (4 against 2), funding raised ($1.0M against $700K). NeuroApplied leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Affective Markets review and pricing or the NeuroApplied review and pricing. You can also browse other Affective Markets alternatives we track.