Affective Markets vs cClearly
Affective Markets vs cClearly, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Affective Markets is on 40/100 and cClearly on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Affective Markets
- domain rating: 4/100 against 3/100
- headcount: 4 against 1
cClearly
- our overall score: 51/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 33/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $5.4M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Affective Markets | cClearly |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered marketing research predicting emotional response to new products for SMBs. | cClearly provides AI-powered marketing analytics and optimization technology to help marketers increase revenue and lower customer acquisition costs. |
| Category | Marketing, Predictive Analytics, MarTech, AdTech | Marketing, Analytics, Marketing Analytics, Marketing Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Affective Markets | cClearly |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 1 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -33.2% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $5.4M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 245 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Affective Markets | cClearly |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 4/100 | 3/100 |
Affective Markets vs cClearly: common questions
Which is better, Affective Markets or cClearly?
On our 0-100 score cClearly rates higher (51/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Affective Markets and cClearly compare on the numbers?
Affective Markets leads on domain rating (4/100 against 3/100), headcount (4 against 1). cClearly leads on our overall score (51/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (33/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($5.4M against $1.0M).
Read the full Affective Markets review and pricing or the cClearly review and pricing. You can also browse other Affective Markets alternatives we track.