AEYE Health vs Medial EarlySign
AEYE Health vs Medial EarlySign, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AEYE Health is on 56/100 and Medial EarlySign on 49/100.
Where each one leads
AEYE Health
- our overall score: 56/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 39 against 8
- headcount growth: +33.6% against -26.4%
- LinkedIn following: 6,538 against 2,122
Medial EarlySign
- domain rating: 31/100 against 27/100
- funding raised: $50.0M against $4.0M
At a glance
| Measure | AEYE Health | Medial EarlySign |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for autonomous, point-of-care interpretation of fundus images for diabetic retinopathy. | Develops AI-powered decision support tools for personalized medical data interpretation and prediction. |
| Category | Healthcare, Optometry, Retinal Screening Ophthalmology, Diabetic Retinopathy | Healthcare, Decision Support, Insights, Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AEYE Health | Medial EarlySign |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 8 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +33.6% | -26.4% |
| Total funding | $4.0M | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,538 | 2,122 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AEYE Health | Medial EarlySign |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AEYE Health | Medial EarlySign |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
AEYE Health vs Medial EarlySign: common questions
Which is better, AEYE Health or Medial EarlySign?
On our 0-100 score AEYE Health rates higher (56/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AEYE Health and Medial EarlySign compare on the numbers?
AEYE Health leads on our overall score (56/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 22/100), headcount (39 against 8), headcount growth (+33.6% against -26.4%), LinkedIn following (6,538 against 2,122). Medial EarlySign leads on domain rating (31/100 against 27/100), funding raised ($50.0M against $4.0M).
Read the full AEYE Health review and pricing or the Medial EarlySign review and pricing. You can also browse other AEYE Health alternatives we track.