Aetna vs Tractable
Aetna vs Tractable, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aetna is on 76/100 and Tractable on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Aetna
- our overall score: 76/100 against 59/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 64/100
- headcount: 40,685 against 300
- funding raised: $19B against $175M
Tractable
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Aetna | Tractable |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A leading diversified health care solutions company offering a wide range of insurance and health services. | AI for visual assessment |
| Category | Health Insurance, Healthcare, Managed Care, HealthTech | Artificial Intelligence, InsurTech, Computer Vision, Property Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 1853 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Hartford, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aetna | Tractable |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40,685 | 300 |
| Total funding | $19B | $175M |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 639,752 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aetna | Tractable |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 99/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 86/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aetna | Tractable |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Aetna vs Tractable: common questions
Which is better, Aetna or Tractable?
On our 0-100 score Aetna rates higher (76/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aetna and Tractable compare on the numbers?
Aetna leads on our overall score (76/100 against 59/100), domain rating (86/100 against 64/100), headcount (40,685 against 300), funding raised ($19B against $175M).
Read the full Aetna review and pricing or the Tractable review and pricing. You can also browse other Aetna alternatives we track.